| 1. |
Bruze, M., B. Gruvberger, and G. Agrup,
Sensitization studies in the guinea pig with the active
ingredients of Euxyl K 400. Contact Dermatitis, 1988. 18(1): p.
37-9. |
| 2. |
Moss, J.N., Sensitization potential of
Euxyl K 400 [letter]. Contact Dermatitis, 1988. 19(5): p. 392-4. |
| 3. |
Senff, H., et al., Allergic contact
dermatitis from Euxyl K 400. Contact Dermatitis, 1989. 20(5): p.
381-2. |
| 4. |
Motolese, A., et al., Frequency of
contact sensitization to Euxyl K 400 [published erratum appears
in Contact Dermatitis 1992 Jan;26(1):71]. Contact Dermatitis,
1991. 25(2): p. 128. |
| 5. |
Tosti, A., et al., Euxyl K 400: a new
sensitizer in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis, 1991. 25(2): p.
89-93. |
| 6. |
Ross, J.S., et al., Contact dermatitis
from Euxyl K 400 in cucumber eye gel. Contact Dermatitis, 1992.
26(1): p. 60. |
| 7. |
Corazza, M., et al., Frequency of
sensitization to Euxyl K 400 in 889 cases. [Review]. Contact
Dermatitis, 1993. 28(5): p. 298-9. |
| 8. |
Gebhart, M., A. Stuhlert, and B. Knopf,
Allergic contact dermatitis due to Euxyl K 400 in an ultrasonic
gel. Contact Dermatitis, 1993. 29(5): p. 272. |
| 9. |
Hausen, B.M., The sensitizing potency of
Euxyl K 400 and its components 1,2-dibromo-2,4-dicyanobutane and
2-phenoxyethanol. Contact Dermatitis, 1993. 28(3): p. 149-53. |
ICD10: L23.9