| 1. |
Mandy, S.H., Letter: Contact dermatitis
to substituted imidazolidinyl urea--a common preservative in
cosmetics. Archives of Dermatology, 1974. 110(3): p. 463. |
| 2. |
Andersen, K.E., et al., Guinea pig
maximization tests with formaldehyde releasers. Results from two
laboratories. Contact Dermatitis, 1984. 10(5): p. 257-66. |
| 3. |
Adams, R.M. and H.I. Maibach, A
five-year study of cosmetic reactions. Journal of the American
Academy of Dermatology, 1985. 13(6): p. 1062-9. |
| 4. |
Dooms-Goossens, A., et al.,
Imidazolidinyl urea dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 1986. 14(5):
p. 322-4. |
| 5. |
Ford, G.P. and M.H. Beck, Reactions to
Quaternium 15, Bronopol and Germall 115 in a standard series.
Contact Dermatitis, 1986. 14(5): p. 271-4. |
| 6. |
de Groot, A.C. and J.W. Weyland, Hidden
contact allergy to formaldehyde in imidazolidinyl urea. Contact
Dermatitis, 1987. 17(2): p. 124-5. |
| 7. |
Ziegler, V., B. Ziegler, and D. Kipping,
Dose-response sensitization experiments with imidazolidinyl
urea. Contact Dermatitis, 1988. 19(3): p. 236-7. |
| 8. |
Foussereau, J. and C. Cavelier, Water
versus petrolatum for testing imidazolidinyl urea. Contact
Dermatitis, 1989. 21(1): p. 54-5. |
| 9. |
van Neer, P.A. and A.M. van der Kley,
Imidazolidinyl urea (Germall 115) should be patch tested in
water. Contact Dermatitis, 1991. 24(4): p. 302. |
| 10. |
Perrenoud, D., et al., Frequency of
sensitization to 13 common preservatives in Switzerland. Swiss
Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Contact Dermatitis, 1994.
30(5): p. 276-9. |
ICD10: L23.9
